“Where my heart belongs”: Disaster-induced displacement in Nabavatu village, Fiji

This short paper draws attention to the plight of a community in Fiji displaced following Tropical Cyclones Yasa and Ana in late 2020 and early 2021. Highlighting applicable international human rights frameworks, the paper calls on the Fijian Government and state duty-bearers everywhere to fulfil their fundamental human rights obligations to people displaced in the context of climate change. The paper also recommends specific actions the Fijian government, humanitarian actors and other stakeholders should take in Nabavatu village and similar contexts, including the support for livelihood development and diversification, inclusive rights-based decision-making, and community-led relocation planning.
Published on March 27, 2025
Merewalesi Yee, Karen E McNamara, Celia McMichael | idrp, IDPs, Disaster, Solutions
Vanua Levu, Fiji. Nabavatu village. 2023 © Mosese Nayabo

Vanua Levu, Fiji. Nabavatu village. 2023 © Mosese Nayabo

Overview of the displacement

The world is increasingly experiencing environmental disasters, including the adverse impacts of climate change. The Pacific Islands region is on the frontline of these challenges, with Fiji particularly vulnerable. As the adverse impacts of climate change escalate, increases in displacement in Fiji become inevitable.

Climate change impacts can amplify existing risks by worsening social, economic, and environmental vulnerabilities. Community members from Nabavatu village on Vanua Levu, Fiji, were displaced by a geohazard event that triggered land slumps, tension cracks, and ground displacements in late 2020. The situation worsened due to heavy rainfall following Tropical Cyclones Yasa (December 2020) and Ana (January 2021), leading to landslides. For their safety, the residents of Nabavatu evacuated to a nearby school.

A geo-technical assessment and aerial mapping conducted by the Fiji Ministry of Lands and Mineral Resources in February 2021 revealed that most dwellings in Nabavatu were at high risk. The Ministry’s report confirmed that all buildings and houses within the medium to high-risk zones had to be relocated to ensure the safety of residents and the community. The village, in its current state, has been deemed unsafe for future habitation due to the ongoing risk of geohazard events. As the Fiji Permanent Secretary for Rural Development stated on December 11, 2024, “Based on that scientific report, we cannot advise them to go back to the old site” (FBC News, 2024). Since January 2021, local community members have been living in tents in an Assemblies of God (AOG) church compound, less than two kilometres from the original village site.

Initially, the 37 households (approximately 169 people, including more than 60 children) were told their stay at the AOG church compound would be temporary, lasting only three months. However, the community has been in tents for over three and a half years. The reality in 2025 is that community members face their fourth consecutive year living in tents.

Two of the authors of this paper visited Nabavatu in April 2024 to listen to and document their experiences and insights into how future displacements and relocation should be managed. We spoke with 30 members of the displaced Nabavatu community, and we share their stories below.

Living conditions

The community continues to face significant challenges, including unstable ground, inadequate shelter, and privacy issues. As one resident noted, “We feel the earth shift beneath our feet, and it makes us anxious every day”. The temporary housing situation remains dire, with families living in tents provided by the Fiji Government, which were originally intended for short-term use but have now been in place for over three years. One mother expressed her frustration, stating, “Heavy rain for the past months and our tent was flooded and we had to dig drainage in the tents to let the water drain out from the tent and the village”. Overcrowding, discomfort and lack of privacy exacerbate the situation, with multiple families often sharing tents. A young father commented, “It’s hard to find a moment alone. We are always on top of each other”. Some women also expressed safety concerns with the tents. “We feel unsafe because it’s not locked, especially when the men leave for the day”.

Access to basic necessities

Access to basic necessities is severely limited, with families relying on shared facilities for water, sanitation, and electricity. “We wait in long lines for water, and when it runs out, we feel helpless”, shared a local elder. Although schools are nearby, the community depends on solar lights and shared electricity sources for their needs. “We can’t study at night. We have to rely on what little light we can get from using my mother’s phone”, a student lamented. The stress of these living conditions weighs heavily on everyone. “Every day feels like a struggle, and we carry that burden in our hearts”, said one community member. Health and safety concerns are prevalent as the tents deteriorate, leading to leaks and other issues. The community healthcare worker warned, “We are seeing more skin diseases and stress-related issues; this environment is not safe for anyone”. According to Habitat for Humanity Fiji (2023), more than 61 individuals have been affected by chronic fungal infections due to overcrowding, and sanitation and hygiene issues.

Delays in relocation

At the beginning of 2024, the Fiji Government approved the relocation of Nabavatu village to a site in Nadoiviri, belonging to the Mataqali Uluitoga and Mataqali Nalutu. This relocation initiative, the first to be funded by Fiji’s Climate Relocation of Communities Trust Fund, will be financed through public contributions from the Environment Climate Adaptation Levy – a tax on luxury services and utilities – along with direct bilateral grants from development partners. The Nabavatu relocation project will be in four phases, with an estimated total cost of FJD5.9 million.

However, there have been extensive delays in permanently relocating this community to the new site. Initially, the Fiji Government assured the community that they would be temporarily displaced in tents for only three months. Promises of new housing have been delayed. While there has been a groundbreaking ceremony, no new homes have been built. The community was told that ten new houses would be constructed by April 2024, but this has not happened. On December 11, 2024, the Fiji Government announced that the construction of 37 houses will now commence in early 2025. Given that the original village is classified as a high-risk zone and the government has restricted return to these areas, this leaves families with no choice but to wait. In March 2025, the residents of Nabavatu finally received some encouraging news as the foundation-laying commenced at the new, future Nabavatu site (Fiji Government, 2025).

Community cohesion

Despite these many hardships and challenges, the displaced community remains close-knit and supportive, with strong social bonds. As the village nurse at the displaced site expressed, “We are very close in here. We are small in numbers, and that assisted us to work closely together”. This sentiment was echoed in a women’s Talanoa discussion, where one woman said, “This new site, we have experienced that the bond between the families has really grown, and we’ve become a very close-knitted community”. However, tensions exist with those remaining at the original site. Cohesion with the original site is weakening, leading to social tensions between those who stayed and those who were displaced. As the women’s Talanoa explained, “When we go back to the old site, we are like visitors, ‘Vulagi’, in our own land. That bond is weakening between us and those in the old site”.

Obligations and responsibilities under international frameworks

The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 (UNDRR, 2015) aims to substantially reduce disaster risks and losses in lives, livelihoods, and health while strengthening resilience. It emphasises understanding disaster risks, enhancing preparedness, and adopting a ‘build back better’ approach in recovery efforts. Similarly, the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement (OCHA, 2004), adopted in 1998, provide a rights-based framework to protect and assist internally displaced persons at all phases of displacement. The Guiding Principles for Children on the Move in the Context of Climate Change (UNICEF, 2022) puts forth nine principles derived from the Convention on the Rights of the Child to safeguard the rights and well-being of children moving in the context of climate change. Together, these principles and guidelines prioritise safe, dignified, and durable solutions while safeguarding the right to housing, health, education and security.

All frameworks underscore the shared responsibility of governments, international agencies, and stakeholders to address displacement and migration in a coordinated and inclusive manner. Their relevance to the Nabavatu relocation process is clear, offering a foundation for practical, rights-based, and sustainable solutions. Drawing from these principles, the following recommendations aim to enhance the living conditions, dignity, and resilience of the displaced Nabavatu community.

Recommendations

We make five key recommendations relating to disaster-induced displacement and relocation, with a focus on access to critical assets, economic empowerment, inclusive decision-making, finance and support, and community-led processes.

  1. Improve living conditions and assets pending physical relocation
    • While the new tents and toilets provided in October 2024 were welcomed, the current infrastructure requires ongoing monitoring and upgrades to ensure privacy, security, and protection from heat and rain. There is currently a need for more cooling solutions, such as fans, and alternatives to sleeping on the ground.
    • All community members should have access to the key assets and resources they need to sustain their lives in a temporary site, such as solar lighting and resources for kitchen gardens, as current distribution is inequitable and inadequate. Access to other essential assets, such as clean drinking water, need ongoing monitoring and maintenance.
    • In line with the Guiding Principles for Children on the Move in the Context of Climate Change (UNICEF, 2022), the State, with support from development partners, must recognise climate-induced mobility as a critical trigger of responsibility. The best interests of children should be a primary concern, ensuring they have uninterrupted access to education, healthcare, and essential social services throughout all stages of their displacement and relocation.
  1. Bolster and diversify livelihoods and economic opportunities
    • Displaced communities are currently in a state of limbo, unable to restart their livelihoods. The community seeks more employment opportunities and economic growth initiatives.
    • It is important to support livelihood diversification with a focus on market demand, such as providing workshops for youth to develop their livelihood interests, activities and skills (e.g. crops and agriculture, textiles and weaving).
  1. Ensure inclusive and rights-based decision-making
    • The community must be more effectively included and involved in the planning and decision-making processes for the new relocation site. More direct communication and consultation between the government and community members is needed. As echoed by one of the women, “They made decisions about our future without even asking us what we wanted. We were only informed after everything was already decided”. This must change.
    • Timely community feedback allows community members to make decisions about their future. The decision-making process must ensure that displaced communities are fully informed and engaged in a participatory manner.
    • It is essential that the government and development partners uphold a rights-based approach that recognises the fundamental human rights of displaced persons under international frameworks such as the Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement and the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. This includes protecting displaced individuals from further harm, ensuring access to adequate housing, and enhancing disaster resilience to prevent future displacement.
    • The Fiji Government and its partners should establish mechanisms to ensure transparency and accountability for relocation timelines. Delays undermine trust and exacerbate emotional and physical harm and suffering.
  1. Acknowledge capacity challenges and mobilise support
    • Growing climate-related challenges may outstrip the resources and capacity of the Fiji Government. More targeted appeals for international support and partnerships will be required to address funding and resource gaps. For example, Fiji’s Climate Relocation of Communities Trust Fund will require additional financing from multilateral organisations and development partners.
    • Ensure that funds are directed effectively to priority areas.
    • In accordance with the Sendai Framework, leverage international cooperation to enhance disaster preparedness and resilience for relocated communities.
  1. Foster a community-led planned relocation process
    • Conduct regular Talanoa sessions to ensure the voices that need to be heard in setting the priorities for planned relocation, including women, girls, older persons, persons with disabilities and youths, are heard and incorporated into relocation strategies.
    • Invest in local capabilities by enhancing communities understanding of climate risks, generating solutions, and managing planned relocation with reduced external influence.
    • State and non-state actors should recognise the value of local knowledge and expertise in adapting to climate risks.
    • Allow communities to adjust planned relocation plans based on evolving climate risks, local priorities, and lived experiences.
    • Support provisions to restore people’s previous livelihoods, or where that is not possible, develop strategies with them to replace livelihoods applicable in the new site.

These recommendations, which would enhance the living conditions, economic opportunities, and overall well-being of the displaced community members of Nabavatu village, are also relevant to other displaced communities in Fiji and beyond. The pervasive failure to uphold fundamental human rights obligations to communities displaced in the context of climate change must be addressed through a coordinated, rights-based approach that emphasises transparency, community engagement, and sustainability.

Merewalesi Yee is an independent consultant on climate mobility including planned relocation, displacement and voluntary immobility. She recently graduated with a PhD from The University of Queensland in July 2024. Her thesis received the 2024 UQ Dean’s Award for Outstanding Higher Degree by Research Theses – in recognition of outstanding contribution to climate (im)mobility research, policy and practice. She integrates her experience in teaching, research and higher education administration to promote a principled, proactive and people-centered climate mobility.

Karen McNamara is a Professor of Development Geography in the School of the Environment at The University of Queensland. She is ultimately interested in how people experience and can improve their capacities to respond to the triple crises of poverty, disaster risk, and climate change. Over the last 20 years, Karen has been undertaking applied research in resilient livelihoods, non-economic loss and damage, community-based adaptation, human mobility, and gender, in close partnership with governments and NGOs throughout the Asia-Pacific region.

Celia McMichael is a Professor of Human Geography and Head of School at The School of Geography, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at The University of Melbourne. Her research focuses on human migration, climate adaptation, and population health. She is currently collaborating with national and international colleagues and partner agencies on research focused on climate change and human mobility in Small Island States. Much of her recent empirical research has focused on planned relocation in Fiji.

KEYWORDS: Climate Change, Evacuation, Displacement, Planned Relocation, Human Rights

DOWNLOAD PDF VERSION

References

Habitat for Humanity Fiji (2023) Rebuilding lives beyond homes: Habitat for Humanity Fiji partners with the Lodge of Fiji 1931EC to assist Nabavatu villages. https://habitatfiji.org.fj/rebuilding-lives-beyond-homes-habitat-for-humanity-fiji-partners-with-the-lodge-of-fiji-1931ec-to-assist-nabavatu-villagers/

FBC News (2024) Nabavatu relocation work to commence early next year. https://www.fbcnews.com.fj/news/nabavatu-relocation-work-to-commence-early-next-year//

Fiji Government (2025). Foundation laying for the new relocated Nabavatu site. Fiji Government – FOUNDATION LAYING FOR THE NEW RELOCATED NABAVATU SITE

OCHA (2004) Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement. https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/43ce1cff2.pdf

UNDRR (2015) Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. https://www.undrr.org/publications/sendai-framework-disaster-risk-reduction-2015-2030

UNICEF (2022) Guiding Principles for children on the move in the context of climate change. Guiding Principles for Children on the Move in the Context of Climate Change: Recommendations for safeguarding the rights and well-being of children regardless of their location or migration status | Knowledge

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Guled Ali | Nov 13, 2025
The Somali Region of Ethiopia has shifted toward local integration as a preferred solution for over one million internally displaced persons (IDPs). This piece examines how the Somali Region's policy blueprint provides a valuable model for integrating displacement responses into development strategies. The blueprint features evidence-based policy, institutional coordination, and community incentives, including plans to transform Qoloji, the region’s largest IDP site, into a city-level administrative or district hub. By placing IDPs at the center of decision-making and adapting to specific social and economic contexts, the Region advances durable, equitable, and development-oriented solutions that offer lessons for Ethiopia and beyond.
By Rachel Stromsta | Nov 6, 2025
This article calls attention to the escalating displacement crisis in South Sudan, where the overlapping impacts of conflict and climate change are deepening insecurity for IDPs and others in displacement affected communities. Highlighting the links between climate events, localized violence and displacement, the article calls on government and civil society stakeholders to acknowledge the worsening 'dual crisis' and do more to embed climate risk management strategies, including disaster risk reduction and climate adaption programming, into civilian protection and conflict resolution policies. Such measures should also support community-based adaptation practices that address IDP needs, empower community leaders and contribute to long-term stability in communities where IDPs reside.
By Jane McAdam, Regina Jefferies, Thomas Mulder | Nov 4, 2025
For many of those displaced by Hurricane Melissa, the real disaster is only just beginning. While close to a million people have been evacuated, undoubtedly saving lives, this will likely be the start of a much longer period of displacement for some individuals and communities. Viewed within the broader existing hazard-scape of violence, conflict, resource scarcity and funding challenges in the region, the dangers compound and grow. This short piece, which discusses the long-term risks to people displaced by Melissa, also spotlights the chronic and worsening underinvestment in people and communities required to reduce the risk of disaster displacement and the devastating long-term effects on those affected. The blog underscores why parties negotiating the text of the forthcoming global treaty on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters must ensure that displacement, evacuation and planned relocations are reflected in the provisions and that commitments to international cooperation are backed by the financial resources necessary to make them real.