How Urban Are IDPs? Between Forcibly Evicted Urban Poor and Conflict IDPs

Drawing on case studies from Nigeria and Colombia, this paper analyses the intersections and tensions between the categories of 'urban IDP' and 'urban poor' who are susceptible to forced evictions.
Published on May 30, 2022
Rebecca Enobong Roberts | genida, IDPs, Internal migration, Vulnerable persons, Urban, Africa, Americas (inc Caribbean)
Nigeria. IDP settlement area in Lagos. 2021 © Rebecca Enobong Roberts

Nigeria. IDP settlement area in Lagos. 2021 © Rebecca Enobong Roberts

Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) who are forced to move to urban areas are commonly portrayed as urban IDPs, this definition negates the existence of indigenous urban poor populations who are susceptible to forced evictions; also fitting into the categorization of ‘urban IDP’. The existing frame and terms of definition assumes unilateral characteristics of who an urban IDP is, thus, aids the formation of generalized perceptions which could inhibit appropriate policy interventions for conflict-IDPs who move to urban areas. The emerging unique vulnerabilities facing this group mandates a review on the think-tank literature on the term urban IDPs. This working paper contends that pre-existing equity that the urban poor who become displaced within the city possesses presents a core divergence point between them, thus, the definition of the urban IDP does not fit the IDPs who are forced to move to cities. Using case studies from Colombia and Nigeria, it argues that conflict IDP due to their pre-existing vulnerabilities and being the outsider in cities are different; necessitating the need for differentiation to better inform urban planning, policy, and humanitarian response for both groups of displaced people in cities.

Rebecca Enobong Roberts is a Ph.D. candidate at the Habitat Unit, Technische Universität Berlin, she teaches community engagement at the Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Her Ph.D. explores the correlation between internal displacement, internal migration and the implication for cities. She possesses 11 years of experience in implementing and managing international development projects across 23 states and multiple cities in Nigeria, Dakar, Senegal, Pretoria and Johannesburg, South Africa, Accra, and Kumasi, Ghana. Her sectoral experience spans community organization, support and engagements, public health, public education, and human rights; including LGBTI rights, informalities (rights to the city, livelihood, and housing), sustainable urbanization, internal displacement, forced migration, youth development, public policy analysis, advocacy, project monitoring, and evaluation.

This paper was written by the author during her Summer Fellowship on Internal Displacement at the Internal Displacement Research Programme at the Refugee Law Initiative. The Fellowship was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, on behalf of the UKRI Global Challenge Research Fund, as part of the funded project “Interdisciplinary Network on Internal Displacement, Conflict and Protection” (AH/T005351/1).

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Tomy Ncube and Una Murray | Mar 12, 2026
As climate impacts intensify, planned relocation is increasingly deployed as an adaptation strategy, yet outcomes for relocated communities remain consistently adverse. This paper argues that these failures stem from the treatment of planned relocation as a short-term, projectised disaster response rather than as a long-term developmental intervention. Drawing on social protection theory, this paper reconceptualises planned relocation as a form of social assistance, capable of delivering durable solutions. It demonstrates that planned relocation inherently performs preventive, protective, promotive, and potentially transformative social protection functions by minimising future climate risks, providing non-contributory transfers such as land and housing, and enabling livelihood reconstruction. However, when implemented outside formal social protection systems, these functions may collapse, often resulting in impoverishment and protracted displacement.
By Steve Miron, Dyuti Tasnuva Rifat, Tanjib Islam | Feb 25, 2026
Researching Internal Displacement is pleased to make this case study available as a stand-alone publication. Excerpted from a recent research and advocacy report by the Refugee Law Initiative, this case study of an urban informal settlement in Tongi, Bangladesh, examines the lived experience of loss and damage among people displaced in the context of climate change and left behind in climate action. Encouragingly, the case study also highlights a promising 'good practice' development intervention by the SAJIDA Foundation. In the case study, programme participants describe how Sajida’s multifaceted approach, which empowers women and girls, encourages positive behaviour change and prioritises psychosocial wellbeing across multiple programme workstreams, has helped restore agency, self-sufficiency and hope. SAJIDA’s programme shows how protracted displacement and associated losses and damages can be addressed and are not inevitable.
By Steven Miron, Dyuti Tasnuva Rifat, Tanjib Islam | Oct 21, 2025
Foregrounding the voices of people living in three different communities of displacement in Bangladesh, this field research and advocacy report examines the nexus of climate change, loss and damage and displacement. This comprehensive report highlights promising interventions by Bangladeshi civil society organisations that have helped internally displaced people (IDPs) living in protracted displacement move toward durable solutions. It also examines positive developments on the policy front, including Bangladesh's fledgling National Strategy on Internal Displacement Management (NSIDM). At the same time, it calls attention to how Bangladesh's protracted displacement crisis remains under acknowledged and therefore under addressed in national policy and programming. The findings and recommendations in this report are intended to inform the UNFCCC's Loss and Damage mechanism – the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD), the Santiago Network for Loss and Damage (SNLD) and the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) ExCom, including its Taskforce on Displacement. Each must urgently demonstrate its commitment to addressing the growing displacement crisis and supporting durable solution programming. The report's findings and recommendations are also relevant to intergovernmental, governmental and civil society organisations working in and outside Bangladesh. Furthermore, the report suggests how conventional durable solutions approaches to displacement must evolve to remain relevant in a world of escalating losses and damages resulting from climate change.