Rethinking Planned Relocation as Social Protection In an Era of Increasing Climate Change Risks

As climate impacts intensify, planned relocation is increasingly deployed as an adaptation strategy, yet outcomes for relocated communities remain consistently adverse. This paper argues that these failures stem from the treatment of planned relocation as a short-term, projectised disaster response rather than as a long-term developmental intervention. Drawing on social protection theory, this paper reconceptualises planned relocation as a form of social assistance, capable of delivering durable solutions. It demonstrates that planned relocation inherently performs preventive, protective, promotive, and potentially transformative social protection functions by minimising future climate risks, providing non-contributory transfers such as land and housing, and enabling livelihood reconstruction. However, when implemented outside formal social protection systems, these functions may collapse, often resulting in impoverishment and protracted displacement.

Published on March 12, 2026

Tomy Ncube and Una Murray | idrp, Climate, Solutions

Mocoa, Putumayo, Colombia. Photo by Franklin Peña Gutierrez from Pexels.

The paper outlines an exploratory framework for qualifying planned relocation within social protection policy and shows how reframing planned relocation as a social housing program can address institutional fragmentation and missed opportunities for climate finance. The authors propose a joint financing model in which international climate funds could support capital investments, while domestic social protection systems focus on service support and rebuilding livelihoods. Reconceptualising planned relocation in this way aligns climate adaptation with social justice objectives and offers a pragmatic pathway for achieving durable solutions for climate-displaced populations.

KEYWORDS: Climate change, planned relocation, social assistance, transformative, displacement, solutions

Tomy Ncube is an international development scholar, and practitioner affiliated with the Geography Department and the Centre for International Development Innovation (CIDI) of the Ryan Institute at the University of Galway, Ireland. His research is at the intersection of climate change, social protection and displacement, particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa. He centres his work on bottom-up evidence to document what works for whom and why, to inform equitable and context-sensitive development interventions.

Dr. Una Murray is an Associate Professor and Director of the MA in International Development Practice at the University of Galway, Ireland (Geography Department) and manages research projects linking climate-related mobility evidence to innovative social protection measures. She is actively engaged with international policy actors, and her wider research spans the climate–security–migration nexus, social protection, gender, agriculture and related themes, building on decades of evaluation work within the UN system.

Download Working Paper No.51

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

Contact the Editorial Team

How to Contribute

The Impact of Funding Cuts on the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons in Haiti and South Sudan

By Kadidjatou Sawadogo | Jun 30, 2026

The working paper examines the impact of humanitarian funding contractions on the realisation of economic and social rights of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Haiti and South Sudan. Drawing on a human rights-based framework, documentary analysis, and key informant interviews, it analyses how reductions in humanitarian assistance affected access to adequate food and healthcare in contexts of protracted displacement, institutional fragility, and humanitarian dependence. The findings show that funding cuts reduced food assistance, disrupted health services, suspended mobile clinics, and weakened nutrition coverage for displaced populations. Humanitarian actors adopted hyper-prioritisation approaches that focused on life‑saving interventions but left significant protection and socio‑economic needs unaddressed.

False Narratives and the Reality of History: The Deportation of Soviet Koreans in 1937

By German Kim, Ekaterina Pesegova (transl.) | Jun 4, 2026

This working paper highlights the relatively unknown deportation of Soviet Koreans, the first of several state deportations based on ethnicity carried out by the Soviet Union. The forced displacement, mainly to Central Asian republics of the former Soviet Union, was highly classified during Soviet times, leading to misunderstandings and subsequent misrepresentations of the event by Western scholars and the creation of multiple inaccurate narratives, including that of ethnic cleansing. By conducting an interdisciplinary study, the author critically analyses widespread misconceptions about the deportation of the Soviet Koreans and provides objective data on the issue and its long-lasting effects on the Soviet Koreans who survived deportation and their descendants.

Moving Towards Solutions: Addressing Loss and Damage from Protracted Displacement in Bangladesh

By Steve Miron, Dyuti Tasnuva Rifat, Tanjib Islam | Feb 25, 2026

Researching Internal Displacement is pleased to make this case study available as a stand-alone publication. Excerpted from a recent research and advocacy report by the Refugee Law Initiative, this case study of an urban informal settlement in Tongi, Bangladesh, examines the lived experience of loss and damage among people displaced in the context of climate change and left behind in climate action. Encouragingly, the case study also highlights a promising 'good practice' development intervention by the SAJIDA Foundation. In the case study, programme participants describe how Sajida’s multifaceted approach, which empowers women and girls, encourages positive behaviour change and prioritises psychosocial wellbeing across multiple programme workstreams, has helped restore agency, self-sufficiency and hope. SAJIDA’s programme shows how protracted displacement and associated losses and damages can be addressed and are not inevitable.