Preventing Internal Displacement when Disasters and Armed Conflict Cross Paths: Challenges and opportunities

This briefing paper addresses the challenge of prevention of internal displacement in contexts where war (or generalized violence) and disasters occur simultaneously
Published on October 21, 2020
Beatriz Eugenia Sánchez-Mojica | idrp, Disaster, Conflict, Violence, Climate, Law/Policy

Internal displacement has multiple causes. It is generally acknowledged that it can be the outcome of armed conflict or generalized violence. It is also accepted that disasters, both natural and man-made, can drive displacement. A scenario that is far more complex – and which has hardly been studied – arises when war (or generalized violence) and disasters occur simultaneously. This briefing paper addresses the challenge of prevention in this context.

To do so, it begins by presenting the scenarios where the  conjunction of these two factors occurs; secondly, it analyzes how existing prevention and resilience-building mechanisms complement one another, despite belonging to three different legal regimes; thirdly, it introduces certain mechanisms and best practices that are currently being implemented to prevent multi-cause internal displacement and finally, it draws some brief conclusions.

The briefing was presented to the UNSG High Level Panel on Internal Displacement in Work-stream 2 (Prevention).

Dr Beatriz Eugenia Sánchez-Mojica is an Independent researcher, Colombia.

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By German Kim, Ekaterina Pesegova (transl.) | Jun 4, 2026
This working paper highlights the relatively unknown deportation of Soviet Koreans, the first of several state deportations based on ethnicity carried out by the Soviet Union. The forced displacement, mainly to Central Asian republics of the former Soviet Union, was highly classified during Soviet times, leading to misunderstandings and subsequent misrepresentations of the event by Western scholars and the creation of multiple inaccurate narratives, including that of ethnic cleansing. By conducting an interdisciplinary study, the author critically analyses widespread misconceptions about the deportation of the Soviet Koreans and provides objective data on the issue and its long-lasting effects on the Soviet Koreans who survived deportation and their descendants.
By Tomy Ncube and Una Murray | Mar 12, 2026
As climate impacts intensify, planned relocation is increasingly deployed as an adaptation strategy, yet outcomes for relocated communities remain consistently adverse. This paper argues that these failures stem from the treatment of planned relocation as a short-term, projectised disaster response rather than as a long-term developmental intervention. Drawing on social protection theory, this paper reconceptualises planned relocation as a form of social assistance, capable of delivering durable solutions. It demonstrates that planned relocation inherently performs preventive, protective, promotive, and potentially transformative social protection functions by minimising future climate risks, providing non-contributory transfers such as land and housing, and enabling livelihood reconstruction. However, when implemented outside formal social protection systems, these functions may collapse, often resulting in impoverishment and protracted displacement.
By Steve Miron, Dyuti Tasnuva Rifat, Tanjib Islam | Feb 25, 2026
Researching Internal Displacement is pleased to make this case study available as a stand-alone publication. Excerpted from a recent research and advocacy report by the Refugee Law Initiative, this case study of an urban informal settlement in Tongi, Bangladesh, examines the lived experience of loss and damage among people displaced in the context of climate change and left behind in climate action. Encouragingly, the case study also highlights a promising 'good practice' development intervention by the SAJIDA Foundation. In the case study, programme participants describe how Sajida’s multifaceted approach, which empowers women and girls, encourages positive behaviour change and prioritises psychosocial wellbeing across multiple programme workstreams, has helped restore agency, self-sufficiency and hope. SAJIDA’s programme shows how protracted displacement and associated losses and damages can be addressed and are not inevitable.