Kenya has in the recent past witnessed an increase in the number of people displaced due to development and reforestation. The cases for Embobut forest, Mau forest and Kibera slums evictions are the latest of such displacements with great human displacement impacts. While in most of these instances it was within the mandate of the Government of Kenya to carry out the displacements on public needs grounds, the displacements were carried out in a manner that violated the socio-economic rights of the affected people.
Thus, the Government of Kenya while conducting the forceful evictions acted contrary to the law and regulations. Notably, the forceful displacements resulted in homelessness, greater poverty, social exclusion and discrimination.
Noteworthy, national, regional and international law requires Kenya to take into account the human rights of the affected people, and to carry out evictions only in instances where there are no other feasible alternatives to the displacement. This brief draws from existing literature in order to point out instances where the government has breached the socioeconomic rights of persons displaced for development projects and reforestation. It highlights the relevant legal requirements in order to assess their adequacies or lack of it in addressing the processes and impacts of displacements for development and reforestation. This brief concludes with recommendations on the proposed ways for mitigating such resulting socio-economic impacts.
By Corrie Sissons | Mar 5, 2026
This article explores how Market-Based Approaches can support internally displaced people by providing essential goods and food security, as well as strengthening social networks, relationships, and trust in their places of displacement. Focused on Sudan, which currently has the world's largest internal displacement crisis, this article provides evidence that Market-Based Programming (MBP) is suitable in adverse contexts. Markets often recover and resume operations before humanitarian agencies can reach affected communities. This resilience enables interventions such as supporting key businesses, using financial service providers for cash assistance, and supporting community-based mutual aid and agricultural markets. When well-managed and intentional, MBP dispels the stereotype that displaced populations are a burden on local economies. MBP not only meets the immediate needs of IDPs with speed and dignity but also supports local economies, fosters social integration, and lays the groundwork for long-term resilience and recovery amid profound uncertainty.
