Articulating the socio-economic impacts of development and reforestation-induced displacements in Kenya

Published on March 10, 2021
Nelly Chepngetich ROTICH | genida

Kenya has in the recent past witnessed an increase in the number of people displaced due to development and reforestation. The cases for Embobut forest, Mau forest and Kibera slums evictions are the latest of such displacements with great human displacement impacts. While in most of these instances it was within the mandate of the Government of Kenya to carry out the displacements on public needs grounds, the displacements were carried out in a manner that violated the socio-economic rights of the affected people.
Thus, the Government of Kenya while conducting the forceful evictions acted contrary to the law and regulations. Notably, the forceful displacements resulted in homelessness, greater poverty, social exclusion and discrimination.
Noteworthy, national, regional and international law requires Kenya to take into account the human rights of the affected people, and to carry out evictions only in instances where there are no other feasible alternatives to the displacement. This brief draws from existing literature in order to point out instances where the government has breached the socioeconomic rights of persons displaced for development projects and reforestation. It highlights the relevant legal requirements in order to assess their adequacies or lack of it in addressing the processes and impacts of displacements for development and reforestation. This brief concludes with recommendations on the proposed ways for mitigating such resulting socio-economic impacts.

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Jennefer Lyn L. Bagaporo and Chona R. Echavez | May 12, 2026
Geopolitical scenarios and possible aid shifts can cut national budgets in countries with internally displaced persons, weakening services they rely on and increasing household stress—leaving children especially vulnerable and undermining stability and development. The Philippines receives official development aid grants mainly for health and social protection from the United Nations and the United States. Shifting global priorities are likely to reduce future funding for these sectors. To systematically trace the effects of aid reduction on IDP children, this paper - the 13th volume in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’ - presents time as an analytical factor. Through a longitudinal cohort study, time-based analysis also presents opportunities to identify sectors that require focus to sustain support for IDP children and policies that necessitate robust, consistent implementation.
By Roger Guiu and Nadia Siddiqui | May 7, 2026
By examining the behavior and living conditions of internally displaced persons (IDPs) across humanitarian, development, and peace indicators, it is possible to know what matters most to displaced populations seeking to return or remain in a location. Quantitative modeling across Iraq, Syria, and Sudan reveal consistent commonalities in IDP decision-making in this regard. However, these critical elements are often not prioritized initially in international and national crisis responses – if they are dealt with at all. This 12th volume in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’ details these findings and their implications, arguing for genuinely centering displaced and conflict-affected populations’ own priorities, wellbeing, and rights as the basis for the resolution of displacement in a changing global order. What is needed is a more robust, simultaneous, and consolidated transversal approach, not a shrunk down status quo.
By Zaldy C. Collado | May 5, 2026
This 11th volume in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’ argues that the global rise of conflict-induced internal displacement and the Doomsday Clock both reflect the same underlying conditions of global fragility and instability. The Doomsday Clock symbolically represents how close our species is to existential demise, due to myriad of reasons including nuclear escalation, geopolitical tensions, climate change, biological and technological hazards, and widespread conflict. By contrast, incidents of internal displacement provide an empirical account of how these threats are felt in human terms. In this respect, the significant increase in incidents of conflict-induced internal displacement worldwide manifests the broader risks captured by the Doomsday Clock. This is not a causal relationship. Rather, it suggests that the growth of internal displacement is not merely as a consequence of conflicts, but also an indicator of deeper structural failures in global governance and peacebuilding.