Bridging disaster risk and internal displacement in Malawi: reflections on Malawi’s Disaster Risk Management Policy

Published on March 2, 2021

Joe MLENGA | genida

This article is a short discussion of the Malawi Disaster Risk Management Policy, a document that is indirectly linked to internally displaced persons (IDPs) in that country.
The paper focuses on how the Policy can be advantageous for internally displaced persons, despite the fact that it does not have terminology such as ‘internal displacement’ or ‘internally displaced persons’. The paper ends by making three recommendations on policy and legislation regarding IDPs in Malawi.
In Malawi, internal displacement is mainly caused by natural disasters such as flash floods over hilly areas, tropical storms and rivers breaking their banks. The biggest natural disasters on record to have struck Malawi include Cyclone Idai in 2019. The storm left 60 people dead, directly affecting 868, 900 people, and 86, 000 of the victims were left in IDP camps. Flooding in 2015, killed 280 people and 230, 000 people were displaced from their homes in half of Malawi’s 28 districts (The Guardian, 2015). Lastly in 1991, flash floods killed between 700 and 1000 persons in the southern district of Phalombe (Daily Times 2016).

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

Contact the Editorial Team

How to Contribute

Displacement in Disasters Is All Too Common, Yet Is Missing from a New Draft Treaty

By Thomas Mulder and Jane McAdam | Apr 17, 2026

Countries around the world are currently negotiating the first-ever global treaty dedicated to protecting people affected by disasters. The treaty on the Protection of Persons in the Event of Disasters—due to be adopted in 2027—aims to improve how States prevent, prepare for and respond to disasters. At the most recent negotiations in New York in April 2026, States signalled their broad support for the treaty’s objectives, including respect for human rights, disaster risk reduction and cooperation to assist countries most affected by climate-related hazards. However, there is a significant omission: disaster-related displacement. This is concerning given that displacement is often one of the most serious and lasting impacts of disasters, which are occurring with greater frequency and intensity. In this blog post, Thomas Mulder and Jane McAdam explain why failing to address displacement risks leaving the treaty out of step with reality. If the treaty is truly to protect people in disasters, it must confront displacement directly—not treat it as an afterthought.

Cutting Aid Means Cutting Rights: Who Decides Which Rights Matter for Internally Displaced Persons?

By Kadidjatou Sawadogo, Paula Gaviria Betancur and Davina Saïd | Apr 14, 2026

Humanitarian funding cuts are increasingly shaping the realisation of rights for internally displaced persons (IDPs). Drawing on evidence from Haiti and South Sudan, this seventh volume in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’ examines how reductions in humanitarian assistance translate into operational trade-offs that affect access to food, healthcare, and protection. In many displacement contexts, humanitarian assistance functions as the system through which basic rights are realised in practice. The authors call for a rights-based approach to humanitarian financing that prioritises and protects funding for essential services in displacement contexts.

Basic Services and Humanitarian Support Amidst Conflict: To Whom to Turn as a Congolese IDP?

By Carolien Jacobs, Delu Lusambya and Patrick Milabyo Kyamusugulwa | Apr 9, 2026

This sixth volume in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’ looks into the impact of the DRC conflict and the shift in powers on the provision of selected basic public services for Congolese IDPs in the east of the country, most notably security, justice and education. We show that basic service provision by state and non-state actors is often inadequate, yet this does not necessarily create a void. Congo’s (civil) society is often stepping in and serving as the first humanitarian actors, responding to the most urgent needs of IDPs and other fellow citizens.