Bridging disaster risk and internal displacement in Malawi: reflections on Malawi’s Disaster Risk Management Policy

Published on March 2, 2021
Joe MLENGA | genida

This article is a short discussion of the Malawi Disaster Risk Management Policy, a document that is indirectly linked to internally displaced persons (IDPs) in that country.
The paper focuses on how the Policy can be advantageous for internally displaced persons, despite the fact that it does not have terminology such as ‘internal displacement’ or ‘internally displaced persons’. The paper ends by making three recommendations on policy and legislation regarding IDPs in Malawi.
In Malawi, internal displacement is mainly caused by natural disasters such as flash floods over hilly areas, tropical storms and rivers breaking their banks. The biggest natural disasters on record to have struck Malawi include Cyclone Idai in 2019. The storm left 60 people dead, directly affecting 868, 900 people, and 86, 000 of the victims were left in IDP camps. Flooding in 2015, killed 280 people and 230, 000 people were displaced from their homes in half of Malawi’s 28 districts (The Guardian, 2015). Lastly in 1991, flash floods killed between 700 and 1000 persons in the southern district of Phalombe (Daily Times 2016).

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Marius Olivier | Apr 30, 2026
In this tenth volume in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’, the author argues that there is a need to move beyond the narrow confines of the traditional life-cycle orientation of the social protection concept, which refers to, among others, health care needs, unemployment and retirement. Social protection should also be able to respond to climate change-related social, economic and climate risks, such as the loss of assets and livelihood opportunities, food insecurity and malnutrition, psychosocial support, and social and productive services. This is particularly important in low- and middle-income countries that often have weak social protection systems and which, despite the heterogeneity and diversity of their systems, continue to bear the brunt of displacement due to climate-related disasters.
By Marie Courtoy | Apr 28, 2026
This ninth volume in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’ argues that international law is currently ill-suited to making human movement part of the solutions to climate change. It remains trapped in a palliative approach in the face of foreseeable risks, with a negative understanding of movement that limits the potential for positive adaptation. However, promoting adaptive mobility could minimise forced movement. Adaptive mobility can be individual, through sustainable solution options for those who decide to leave, or planned with the support of public authorities, subject to certain considerations and safeguards. The article proposes a conceptual evolution of human movements in international law to promote adaptive mobility and thus avoid displacement, while emphasising the need to consider the context in any (im)mobile adaptation measure.
By Igor Paulo Ubisse Capitine, Álvaro Marcela Manhiça, Willy Susse de Jesus Monjane, Ivan da Costa Tomás Jr and Paulo Salvador da Silva Tembe Jr | Apr 21, 2026
As global humanitarian funding declines and nationalist agendas gain prominence, internally displaced populations (IDPs) face growing health and social risks. Using Mozambique as a central case, this eighth paper in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’ examines how shifting political and financial dynamics are reshaping the social determinants of health for IDPs in contexts of recurrent displacement. In Mozambique, where conflict, climate-related hazards, and structural poverty make displacement predictable rather than exceptional, humanitarian assistance has been critical in saving lives but remains predominantly short-term and crisis-driven, failing to address the structural drivers of displacement, leaving many exposed to cumulative health and social vulnerability once emergency responses subside. The paper argues for a transition toward resilient, nationally led systems that integrate IDPs into inclusive health, social protection, and climate adaptation agendas, reframing displacement as a core health equity and development challenge rather than a temporary humanitarian concern.