This brief provides insight into the lived experiences of internally displaced Persons (IDP) in Benue state, Nigeria, reflecting on some of the challenges encountered. The information gathered in this brief is from the visit to Abagana IDP camp and the International Market IDP camp across two periods in 2017 and 2019. The author observes that the conditions in the camp is inadequate in meeting the needs of IDPs. There is a need for enhanced response to the IDP situation in the state.
Benue State is located in the north-central geographical zone of Nigeria, comprising of major ethnic groups such as Tiv, Igede, and Idoma with its capital in Makurdi. The state is endowed with natural resources and a fertile land for growing crops such thus, positioning the state as Nigeria’s food basket. However, in recent years, it has been affected by situations of internal displacement. At least 9 out of the 23 local governments in the state are affected by crisis leaving over 50,000 displaced people (Christian Aid Organisation 2015). The causes of the displacement, are particularly herder –farmer clashes and banditry (Higazi, A. et al 2018). This Brief reflects on the challenges that IDPs encounter. The findings in this brief were collected across two separate periods. Firstly, between July and September 2017 and subsequently, between February and April 2019.
By Nishara Fernando | Dec 4, 2025
This policy brief examines the forced and mostly failed relocation of members of coastal Sri Lankan communities following the 2004 tsunami that devastated parts of the country. In the aftermath of the tsunami, the Sri Lankan government decided to enforce a coastal buffer zone law that banned housing within proximity to the coastline, requiring residents in the buffer zone to vacate and move to poorly planned and constructed housing in ill-conceived relocation sites. As government and civil society organisations involved in the relocation gradually disengaged from the project, community members were left to fend for themselves amidst growing economic and social challenges associated with the relocation. As such, many families eventually returned to the buffer zone, exposing themselves to both legal and coastal hazard risks. This blog highlights how failure to involve communities in the planning and development of the relocation project has led to a second disaster for tsunami-affected communities – that of a poorly implemented planned relocation.
