The realities of urban slum dwellers in the wake of COVID-19: a case study on forced evictions in Lagos, Nigeria

Published on March 9, 2021
Unyime EYO | genida

Covid-19 has heightened vulnerabilities for slum dwellers in cities across the global south. In African metropolises such as Lagos, Nigeria – slum dwellers represent part of the vulnerable groups bearing the brunt of the current health crisis. More specifically, the pandemic has brought worsened realities for displaced urban slum populations who have historically been victims of forced evictions, carried out by the city government to meet overly ambitious development agendas. Undoubtedly, forced evictions (inclusive of those carried out before & during the pandemic) have left displaced urban slum dwellers homeless and in inhumane living conditions. These increasing realities have made them more susceptible to risks associated with the virus. In unprecedented times such as this, it is therefore crucial, more so than ever before, that the existing legal framework (though fragmented) should be fully utilized, to afford Urban IDPs, legal protections they so desperately need. In advancing these protections, democratic institutions such as the Courts play an important role by giving holistic interpretations to basic rights contained in extant laws such as the Constitution, as well as handing down bold, definitive and enforceable orders. This brief seeks to evaluate the situation of displaced urban slum populations in Lagos, in the era of Covid-19, a critique of the existing legal framework and the government’s response to the plights of Urban IDPs. Lastly, it shares how advocacy efforts such as public interest litigation can aid in preserving the rights of Urban IDPs even in this period.

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Tomas Balkelis | Jan 8, 2026
This brief article highlights the lesser-known deportations of people from Lithuania conducted in 1940-1950s by the Soviet authorities. The unlawful Soviet actions led to the forced displacement, imprisonment, and deaths of thousands of Lithuanians within the Soviet Union, resulting in significant shifts in political, cultural, and economic life in Lithuanian society. Since the Soviet government concealed the deportations until just before the Soviet Union's collapse, scholars are still at work analysing the deportations and their long-lasting consequences for the re-establishment of Lithuania's independence in 1990, for Lithuanian historical memory and national identity. This blog provides a glimpse into this tragic period in Lithuanian history.
By John Mussington | Dec 18, 2025
This short blog by a Barbudan community advocate examines how the Government of Antigua and Barbuda cynically forced the evacuation of Barbuda during Hurricane Irma in 2017 to make way for a luxury real estate development project catering to the exclusive private lifestyles of millionaires. Declaring the island ‘uninhabitable’, the government used threats and dubious legal procedures to confiscate all Barbudan land and prevent Barbudans from asserting their right to live on their land and island. Eight years on, Barbudans, led by community representatives and activists, continue their struggle. As the author notes, their challenges have strengthened the resolve of the people of Barbuda and helped forge alliances with other communities facing similar injustices.
By Nishara Fernando | Dec 4, 2025
This policy brief examines the forced and mostly failed relocation of members of coastal Sri Lankan communities following the 2004 tsunami that devastated parts of the country. In the aftermath of the tsunami, the Sri Lankan government decided to enforce a coastal buffer zone law that banned housing within proximity to the coastline, requiring residents in the buffer zone to vacate and move to poorly planned and constructed housing in ill-conceived relocation sites. As government and civil society organisations involved in the relocation gradually disengaged from the project, community members were left to fend for themselves amidst growing economic and social challenges associated with the relocation. As such, many families eventually returned to the buffer zone, exposing themselves to both legal and coastal hazard risks. This blog highlights how failure to involve communities in the planning and development of the relocation project has led to a second disaster for tsunami-affected communities – that of a poorly implemented planned relocation.