Durable Solutions for IDPs: Normative Anchors in International Human Rights Law

This paper explores the scope, content and nature of the normative basis for IDP solutions in international human rights law.
Published on June 27, 2023
Deborah Casalin | idrp, IDPs, Solutions, Law/Policy
South Sudan. 21 IDPs return to Bentiu hometown. 2020 © UNMISS: Isaac Billy

South Sudan. 21 IDPs return to Bentiu hometown. 2020 © UNMISS: Isaac Billy

The traditional durable solutions of return, resettlement or local integration – originating in refugee policy, and more recently transposed to internal displacement situations – have long been viewed as standard reference points for resolving displacement. However, the normative basis for durable solutions for internally displaced persons (IDPs) in international law remains under-examined and unclear in many respects, especially regarding the scope and status of relevant rights and obligations and identification of duty-bearers. This provides a relatively weak footing for the legality/normativity of a human rights-based approach to durable solutions, which has been asserted as offering the fairest and most sustainable results.

International legal norms underlying durable solutions for IDPs has mainly been articulated and developed through soft law and regional treaties. Legal research around these instruments has largely focused on their origins, domestication and implementation, while (sparse) research on the normative underpinnings of durable solutions for IDPs has mostly zoomed in on discrete issues around specific solutions, particularly in conflict situations. While research on durable solutions from the field of international refugee law may offer parallels, differences in underlying state responsibilities may complicate extension of its conclusions by analogy.

This paper therefore aims to explore the scope, content and nature of the normative basis for IDP solutions in the perspective of a human rights-based approach via mapping and analysis of primary and secondary doctrinal sources in international human rights law – also drawing on the author’s research on reparation for displacement, and with an emphasis on the contributions of international and regional (quasi-)judicial human rights mechanisms. This analysis will allow for delineation of a number of future research questions on rights and responsibilities in resolving displacement. It may also contribute to discussions on the need for an IDP treaty (and its scope), as well as the development of a distinct body of IDP law.

KEYWORDS: Internal displacement; IDPs; durable solutions; international law; human rights

Dr Deborah Casalin is Principal Research Fellow at the University of Antwerp Faculty of Law – Law and Development Research Group, where she is examining durable solutions for IDPs from a legal perspective. Her doctoral research, defended in 2022 at the same faculty, explores the role of international (quasi-)judicial human rights bodies in ensuring reparation for arbitrary displacement. She is a research affiliate of the RLI Internal Displacement Research Programme.

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Steven Miron, Dyuti Tasnuva Rifat, Tanjib Islam | Oct 21, 2025
Foregrounding the voices of people living in three different communities of displacement in Bangladesh, this field research and advocacy report examines the nexus of climate change, loss and damage and displacement. This comprehensive report highlights promising interventions by Bangladeshi civil society organisations that have helped internally displaced people (IDPs) living in protracted displacement move toward durable solutions. It also examines positive developments on the policy front, including Bangladesh's fledgling National Strategy on Internal Displacement Management (NSIDM). At the same time, it calls attention to how Bangladesh's protracted displacement crisis remains under acknowledged and therefore under addressed in national policy and programming. The findings and recommendations in this report are intended to inform the UNFCCC's Loss and Damage mechanism – the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD), the Santiago Network for Loss and Damage (SNLD) and the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) ExCom, including its Taskforce on Displacement. Each must urgently demonstrate its commitment to addressing the growing displacement crisis and supporting durable solution programming. The report's findings and recommendations are also relevant to intergovernmental, governmental and civil society organisations working in and outside Bangladesh. Furthermore, the report suggests how conventional durable solutions approaches to displacement must evolve to remain relevant in a world of escalating losses and damages resulting from climate change.
By Ana Paredes Marín y Alejandra Barrios Ariano | Jul 3, 2025
Este documento de trabajo muestra que las experiencias de desplazamiento forzado interno de mujeres en el Corredor Seco de Guatemala evidencian cómo los eventos hidrometeorológicos, como huracanes y sequías, agravan las desigualdades estructurales entre esas, la de género.