Enacting A Complex Social Masculinity: Internally-Displaced Filipino Men’s Response to Varied Personalities

This paper explores masculinity in conflict-affected contexts in the Philippines, emphasizing the complexity of displaced men’s behaviours during displacement and post-siege. The findings challenge simplistic narratives that categorize men as either victims or perpetrators. Instead, the study emphasizes the complexity of men’s responses and underscores the need for gender-responsive approaches in displacement-related decision-making processes.
Published on May 30, 2024
Jennefer Lyn L. Bagaporo | idrp, IDPs, Humanities, Asia-Pacific
Philippines. Displaced persons camp 2010 © International Disaster Volunteers

Philippines. Displaced persons camp 2010 © International Disaster Volunteers

The Philippines has a history of five decades of protracted violent conflicts and internal displacements, making it one of the world’s longest-running violent conflicts in the Southeast Asian region. Like the global literature on conflict and internal displacement, most of the Philippines’ literature in this context delves into the conditions of children and women. While the focus on these sectors is critical and cannot be overemphasised, an investigation into noncombatant men’s masculinities is imperative, as men’s masculinities have corresponding outcomes on women and gender-related interventions. This paper presents the case of noncombatant Filipino men’s masculinities, with a focus on their enactment of a compounded social masculinity. Given the conventional notion that the public arena is a man’s domain, it is inevitable that men encounter diverse personalities pre-, during, and post-conflict and internal displacement.

The 31 life story interviews with noncombatant Filipino men, supplemented by data from focus group discussions and in-depth interviews with 26 women and community profiles from local officials, revealed that noncombatant Filipino men reconfigured their masculinities in relation to other personalities. Men’s complex social masculinity involved the enactment of good-natured masculinity and cautious masculinity. This finding is crucial because it complicates the usual victim-perpetrator binary when classifying men in conflict and forced displacement settings. Furthermore, the findings articulate noncombatant Filipino men’s agentic selves as they reconstruct their masculinities towards personalities that are unfamiliar, dangerous, or embodiments of internalised colonial demonisations. Considering these findings towards engaging men in gender-related programmes in conflict and internal displacement settings might encourage and gain more meaningful participation.

KEYWORDS: Masculinities; Violent conflict; Internal displacement; Noncombatant; Filipino men; Philippines; Social masculinity

Jennefer Lyn L. Bagaporo, a research affiliate at the Research Institute for Mindanao Culture (RIMCU) at Xavier University in the Philippines, holds a PhD in Gender Studies from the University of Adelaide, South Australia. Her most recent publication is a study on conflict-induced internally displaced Filipino men’s enactments of masculinity, titled “Yes, I’m Doing It,” published in the journal Men and Masculinities (vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 523–543) in 2023.

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Kadidjatou Sawadogo | Jun 30, 2026
The working paper examines the impact of humanitarian funding contractions on the realisation of economic and social rights of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Haiti and South Sudan. Drawing on a human rights-based framework, documentary analysis, and key informant interviews, it analyses how reductions in humanitarian assistance affected access to adequate food and healthcare in contexts of protracted displacement, institutional fragility, and humanitarian dependence. The findings show that funding cuts reduced food assistance, disrupted health services, suspended mobile clinics, and weakened nutrition coverage for displaced populations. Humanitarian actors adopted hyper-prioritisation approaches that focused on life‑saving interventions but left significant protection and socio‑economic needs unaddressed.
By German Kim, Ekaterina Pesegova (transl.) | Jun 4, 2026
This working paper highlights the relatively unknown deportation of Soviet Koreans, the first of several state deportations based on ethnicity carried out by the Soviet Union. The forced displacement, mainly to Central Asian republics of the former Soviet Union, was highly classified during Soviet times, leading to misunderstandings and subsequent misrepresentations of the event by Western scholars and the creation of multiple inaccurate narratives, including that of ethnic cleansing. By conducting an interdisciplinary study, the author critically analyses widespread misconceptions about the deportation of the Soviet Koreans and provides objective data on the issue and its long-lasting effects on the Soviet Koreans who survived deportation and their descendants.
By Tomy Ncube and Una Murray | Mar 12, 2026
As climate impacts intensify, planned relocation is increasingly deployed as an adaptation strategy, yet outcomes for relocated communities remain consistently adverse. This paper argues that these failures stem from the treatment of planned relocation as a short-term, projectised disaster response rather than as a long-term developmental intervention. Drawing on social protection theory, this paper reconceptualises planned relocation as a form of social assistance, capable of delivering durable solutions. It demonstrates that planned relocation inherently performs preventive, protective, promotive, and potentially transformative social protection functions by minimising future climate risks, providing non-contributory transfers such as land and housing, and enabling livelihood reconstruction. However, when implemented outside formal social protection systems, these functions may collapse, often resulting in impoverishment and protracted displacement.