Internal Displacement as a Development Challenge

This paper synthesises existing analyses of how to address internal displacement as a development challenge
Published on August 21, 2020
Hana Asfour, Sabria Al-Thawr and Chantal Chastonay | idrp, Development, Humanitarian, Solutions

This paper synthesises existing analyses of how to address internal displacement as a development challenge. It begins by describing how internal displacement can be appropriately considered as a development challenge (part 1). It then asks how the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can be leveraged to promote greater emphasis on addressing internal displacement in the context of sustainable development (part 2). It then examines how development approaches might be integrated within humanitarian work with internally displaced persons (IDPs) from the outset to achieve this objective (part 3). Finally, it summarises the main recommendations resulting from the foregoing analysis for consideration by the High-Level Panel (part 4).

This paper was presented to the UNSG High Level Panel on Internal Displacement in Work-stream 3 (International System and Solutions).

Dr Hana Asfour is the Head of Research, Q Perspective, Jordan, Dr Sabria Al-Thawr is at the Gender and Development Research and Studies Center, Sana’a University, and Chantal Chastonay is at the Danish Refugee Council.

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Kadidjatou Sawadogo | Jun 30, 2026
The working paper examines the impact of humanitarian funding contractions on the realisation of economic and social rights of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Haiti and South Sudan. Drawing on a human rights-based framework, documentary analysis, and key informant interviews, it analyses how reductions in humanitarian assistance affected access to adequate food and healthcare in contexts of protracted displacement, institutional fragility, and humanitarian dependence. The findings show that funding cuts reduced food assistance, disrupted health services, suspended mobile clinics, and weakened nutrition coverage for displaced populations. Humanitarian actors adopted hyper-prioritisation approaches that focused on life‑saving interventions but left significant protection and socio‑economic needs unaddressed.
By German Kim, Ekaterina Pesegova (transl.) | Jun 4, 2026
This working paper highlights the relatively unknown deportation of Soviet Koreans, the first of several state deportations based on ethnicity carried out by the Soviet Union. The forced displacement, mainly to Central Asian republics of the former Soviet Union, was highly classified during Soviet times, leading to misunderstandings and subsequent misrepresentations of the event by Western scholars and the creation of multiple inaccurate narratives, including that of ethnic cleansing. By conducting an interdisciplinary study, the author critically analyses widespread misconceptions about the deportation of the Soviet Koreans and provides objective data on the issue and its long-lasting effects on the Soviet Koreans who survived deportation and their descendants.
By Tomy Ncube and Una Murray | Mar 12, 2026
As climate impacts intensify, planned relocation is increasingly deployed as an adaptation strategy, yet outcomes for relocated communities remain consistently adverse. This paper argues that these failures stem from the treatment of planned relocation as a short-term, projectised disaster response rather than as a long-term developmental intervention. Drawing on social protection theory, this paper reconceptualises planned relocation as a form of social assistance, capable of delivering durable solutions. It demonstrates that planned relocation inherently performs preventive, protective, promotive, and potentially transformative social protection functions by minimising future climate risks, providing non-contributory transfers such as land and housing, and enabling livelihood reconstruction. However, when implemented outside formal social protection systems, these functions may collapse, often resulting in impoverishment and protracted displacement.