Mexico and the exiles displaced by the violence of the new century

Based on the Mexican experience, this paper seeks to show how the concept of internal displacement and its application hides many experiences of forced migration that have occurred at the beginning of the 21st century, particularly those produced within the framework of violence related to Organized Crime.
Published on January 25, 2024
Leticia Calderón Chelius and May-ek Querales | lanid, IDPs, Refugees, Violence, Americas (inc Caribbean)
Mexico. Protesta "Altar por lo que dejamos". 2012 © May-ek Querales Mendoza

Mexico. Protesta "Altar por lo que dejamos". 2012 © May-ek Querales Mendoza

This working paper aims to contribute to the discussion around the concept of internal displacement, which only recognizes forced mobility that occurs within a national territory. Based on the Mexican experience, we seek to show how the concept of internal displacement and its application hides many experiences of forced migration that have occurred at the beginning of the 21st century, particularly those produced within the framework of violence related to Organized Crime. To achieve our objective, we recap the experience of a group of Mexican displaced persons who were forced to flee the country. Due to the lack of public policy to provide them with protection and assistance in Mexico, they assumed the identity of exiles in the United States and converted that experience into a driving force of struggle and demand for justice.

KEYWORDS: Internal displacement; forced migration; public policy

Dr Leticia Calderón Chelius: Professor and researcher at Instituto Mora, Mexico. Member of the national researchers system (SNI), level 3. President of the patrons of Sin Fronteras IAP. Coordinator of “migrantologists” network.

Dr May-ek Querales Mendoza: Professor at FCPyS-UNAM, Mexico. Candidate to the national researchers system (SNI). Co-founder of the Research Group in Social and Forensic Anthropology (GIASF). Researches on the interaction between forced migration and forced disappearances.

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Kadidjatou Sawadogo | Jun 30, 2026
The working paper examines the impact of humanitarian funding contractions on the realisation of economic and social rights of internally displaced persons (IDPs) in Haiti and South Sudan. Drawing on a human rights-based framework, documentary analysis, and key informant interviews, it analyses how reductions in humanitarian assistance affected access to adequate food and healthcare in contexts of protracted displacement, institutional fragility, and humanitarian dependence. The findings show that funding cuts reduced food assistance, disrupted health services, suspended mobile clinics, and weakened nutrition coverage for displaced populations. Humanitarian actors adopted hyper-prioritisation approaches that focused on life‑saving interventions but left significant protection and socio‑economic needs unaddressed.
By German Kim, Ekaterina Pesegova (transl.) | Jun 4, 2026
This working paper highlights the relatively unknown deportation of Soviet Koreans, the first of several state deportations based on ethnicity carried out by the Soviet Union. The forced displacement, mainly to Central Asian republics of the former Soviet Union, was highly classified during Soviet times, leading to misunderstandings and subsequent misrepresentations of the event by Western scholars and the creation of multiple inaccurate narratives, including that of ethnic cleansing. By conducting an interdisciplinary study, the author critically analyses widespread misconceptions about the deportation of the Soviet Koreans and provides objective data on the issue and its long-lasting effects on the Soviet Koreans who survived deportation and their descendants.
By Tomy Ncube and Una Murray | Mar 12, 2026
As climate impacts intensify, planned relocation is increasingly deployed as an adaptation strategy, yet outcomes for relocated communities remain consistently adverse. This paper argues that these failures stem from the treatment of planned relocation as a short-term, projectised disaster response rather than as a long-term developmental intervention. Drawing on social protection theory, this paper reconceptualises planned relocation as a form of social assistance, capable of delivering durable solutions. It demonstrates that planned relocation inherently performs preventive, protective, promotive, and potentially transformative social protection functions by minimising future climate risks, providing non-contributory transfers such as land and housing, and enabling livelihood reconstruction. However, when implemented outside formal social protection systems, these functions may collapse, often resulting in impoverishment and protracted displacement.