What theatre brings to the discussion on internal displacement in Africa

As a theatre practitioner who has worked in over a dozen countries across four continents in diverse creative and community contexts, my mode of engagement in the narrative on internal displacement is using drama as a tool for creating positive and safe space in the discussion on internal displacement.
Published on March 10, 2021
Taiwo Afolabi | genida

I engage with different stakeholders and raise critical and ethical questions around sensitive issues on internal displacement. This is because I believe that theatre is useful as it provides a space for conversation around critical and sensitive issues.
In my works as a theatre practitioner, I designed a drama curriculum on internal displacement. I worked with high school students in Nigeria who had experienced displacement in the northern part of the country prior moving to the Southwest. For me, what inspired the idea was the UN Guiding Principles and the fact that it is government’s responsibility to protect. Also, many people do not even know such a document of exist. And I felt it was needful to create awareness about the document and also discuss what the role of the government really is in the protection of displaced persons. As someone who experienced displacement during Jos crisis in Nigeria, I have been thinking of ways to engage my arts to foster participation of IDPs on issues that concern them. And theatre is a good way of reflecting on these issues. Considering the fact that drama is affect-driven and uses a qualitative approach as an avenue to engender debates and facilitate dialogues, it helps to build empathy, provoke critical thinking, and collective actions that will provide perspectives which potentially can shape policies and potential collaborations on initiatives on internal displacement.

There are some key benefits of theatre in the IDP narrative. I strongly believe that stories from daily lived experienced of IDPs can be unpacked using theatre conventions such as image theatre, music, games and other techniques. However, it is useful to highlight some of the key advantages of theatre.

First, theatre provides an avenue for awareness and education on internal displacement. In my experience, I’ve used theatre to educate people on the Guiding Principles. One of the things that theatre does is that stories share light on the lived experience of people. The education in theatre happens when through story-telling light is shone on issues and critical questions are raised. Theatre breaks barriers for people to see and step into other people’s shoes.

Second, theatre creates a space for robust conversation in a non-threatening way. I believe that performances have a way of speaking to an issue without being confrontational. Artists have power to imagine and speak to power in a non-threatening way. As such, it creates an opportunity to speak back to the government without entering trouble.

Theatre leverages on the power of story-telling. In this context, theatre has become a tool for social transformation and people’s empowerment. If effectively employed, theatre arts could be used as a platform to convey compelling ideas and spark engaging debates about social issues such as education, peace, development and governance, among others.

Fourth, theatre helps as a methodology to foster participation and build listening skills. Through theatre, people can be part of processes/decision-making. Theatre also provides an opportunity to actually raise consciousness beyond teaching the people. Moreover, theatre can help researchers and policy makers to hear from the concerned population, IDPs in order to better understand what they need rather than what we think they need.

About the author:
Taiwo Afolabi is an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Media, Arts and Performance at the University of Regina, Canada. He is the founding artistic director of Theatre Emissary International, Nigeria and research associate with the University of Johannesburg, South Africa. He is a Member of the Global Engagement Network on Internal Displacement in Africa.

This blog forms part of research of the Global Engagement on Internal Displacement in Africa (GENIDA) (EP/T003227/1) projects supported by the UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF).

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Jennefer Lyn L. Bagaporo and Chona R. Echavez | May 12, 2026
Geopolitical scenarios and possible aid shifts can cut national budgets in countries with internally displaced persons, weakening services they rely on and increasing household stress—leaving children especially vulnerable and undermining stability and development. The Philippines receives official development aid grants mainly for health and social protection from the United Nations and the United States. Shifting global priorities are likely to reduce future funding for these sectors. To systematically trace the effects of aid reduction on IDP children, this paper - the 13th volume in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’ - presents time as an analytical factor. Through a longitudinal cohort study, time-based analysis also presents opportunities to identify sectors that require focus to sustain support for IDP children and policies that necessitate robust, consistent implementation.
By Roger Guiu and Nadia Siddiqui | May 7, 2026
By examining the behavior and living conditions of internally displaced persons (IDPs) across humanitarian, development, and peace indicators, it is possible to know what matters most to displaced populations seeking to return or remain in a location. Quantitative modeling across Iraq, Syria, and Sudan reveal consistent commonalities in IDP decision-making in this regard. However, these critical elements are often not prioritized initially in international and national crisis responses – if they are dealt with at all. This 12th volume in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’ details these findings and their implications, arguing for genuinely centering displaced and conflict-affected populations’ own priorities, wellbeing, and rights as the basis for the resolution of displacement in a changing global order. What is needed is a more robust, simultaneous, and consolidated transversal approach, not a shrunk down status quo.
By Zaldy C. Collado | May 5, 2026
This 11th volume in our series on ‘Internal Displacement in a Changing World Order’ argues that the global rise of conflict-induced internal displacement and the Doomsday Clock both reflect the same underlying conditions of global fragility and instability. The Doomsday Clock symbolically represents how close our species is to existential demise, due to myriad of reasons including nuclear escalation, geopolitical tensions, climate change, biological and technological hazards, and widespread conflict. By contrast, incidents of internal displacement provide an empirical account of how these threats are felt in human terms. In this respect, the significant increase in incidents of conflict-induced internal displacement worldwide manifests the broader risks captured by the Doomsday Clock. This is not a causal relationship. Rather, it suggests that the growth of internal displacement is not merely as a consequence of conflicts, but also an indicator of deeper structural failures in global governance and peacebuilding.