‘Better to be raped than to be killed’: A gendered analysis of internal displacement in Burkina Faso

Why a gendered analysis of internal displacement and conflict is crucial to understand the current humanitarian crisis in Burkina Faso and to escape false dichotomies of pre-, post- and during conflict ruptures
Published on November 17, 2021
Josefine Brons | genida, IDPs, Hosts, Gender, Social Cohesion, Africa

© UNHCR/Nana Kofi Acquah

Burkina Faso is experiencing one of the fastest growing internal displacement crises in the world, currently counting 1.5 million internally displaced persons (IDPs). 80% of the displaced population is made up of women and children. Struggling with insecurity due to attacks from international and local armed groups in the Sahel, domestic political instability, climate change and deeply rooted farmer-herder conflicts, Burkina Faso’s population, displaced or not, is facing a complex humanitarian crisis that shows little signs of abating.

Since research into internal displacement in Burkina Faso is still scarce, this paper attempts to develop an initial analysis. It takes a gendered approach to understand how different social groups are affected by internal displacement, how they adapt to a context of crisis and to what extent gender helps us reveal continuities of violence and solidarity. Gender, rather than an essentialised category of being, is used as a frame for understanding social relations. The aim is to analyse how gender shapes experiences of displacement, violence, and solidarity among IDP and host populations in Burkina Faso today.

Starting with the continued stigmatisation of rape (survivors), the paper moves on to interrogate negative coping mechanisms of displaced communities, including the link between early and forced marriages and host-displaced community relationships, the gendered dimension of social cohesion, and survival sex work. In a third section that focuses on decision-making processes, it will take a closer look at female-headed households, mobility, and women support networks. Finally, the paper will consider forced recruitment as a form of gender-based violence and examine women’s involvement in combat. It will be argued that a gendered analysis of internal displacement and conflict is crucial to understanding the current humanitarian crisis in Burkina Faso and escaping false dichotomies of pre-, post and conflict ruptures.

Josefine Brons is a graduate student in International Affairs at Sciences Po Paris and the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). She previously worked at UNHCR’s Regional Bureau for West and Central Africa in Dakar, Senegal.

This paper was written by the author during her Summer Fellowship on Internal Displacement at the Internal Displacement Research Programme at the Refugee Law Initiative. The Fellowship was supported by the Arts and Humanities Research Council, on behalf of the UKRI Global Challenge Research Fund, as part of the funded project “Interdisciplinary Network on Internal Displacement, Conflict and Protection” (AH/T005351/1).

HOW TO CONTRIBUTE

Researching Internal Displacement publishes engaging and insightful short pieces of writing, artistic and research outputs, policy briefings and think pieces on internal displacement.

We welcome contributions from academics, practitioners, researchers, officials, artists, poets, writers, musicians, dancers, postgraduate students and people affected by internal displacement.

By Tomy Ncube and Una Murray | Mar 12, 2026
As climate impacts intensify, planned relocation is increasingly deployed as an adaptation strategy, yet outcomes for relocated communities remain consistently adverse. This paper argues that these failures stem from the treatment of planned relocation as a short-term, projectised disaster response rather than as a long-term developmental intervention. Drawing on social protection theory, this paper reconceptualises planned relocation as a form of social assistance, capable of delivering durable solutions. It demonstrates that planned relocation inherently performs preventive, protective, promotive, and potentially transformative social protection functions by minimising future climate risks, providing non-contributory transfers such as land and housing, and enabling livelihood reconstruction. However, when implemented outside formal social protection systems, these functions may collapse, often resulting in impoverishment and protracted displacement.
By Steve Miron, Dyuti Tasnuva Rifat, Tanjib Islam | Feb 25, 2026
Researching Internal Displacement is pleased to make this case study available as a stand-alone publication. Excerpted from a recent research and advocacy report by the Refugee Law Initiative, this case study of an urban informal settlement in Tongi, Bangladesh, examines the lived experience of loss and damage among people displaced in the context of climate change and left behind in climate action. Encouragingly, the case study also highlights a promising 'good practice' development intervention by the SAJIDA Foundation. In the case study, programme participants describe how Sajida’s multifaceted approach, which empowers women and girls, encourages positive behaviour change and prioritises psychosocial wellbeing across multiple programme workstreams, has helped restore agency, self-sufficiency and hope. SAJIDA’s programme shows how protracted displacement and associated losses and damages can be addressed and are not inevitable.
By Steven Miron, Dyuti Tasnuva Rifat, Tanjib Islam | Oct 21, 2025
Foregrounding the voices of people living in three different communities of displacement in Bangladesh, this field research and advocacy report examines the nexus of climate change, loss and damage and displacement. This comprehensive report highlights promising interventions by Bangladeshi civil society organisations that have helped internally displaced people (IDPs) living in protracted displacement move toward durable solutions. It also examines positive developments on the policy front, including Bangladesh's fledgling National Strategy on Internal Displacement Management (NSIDM). At the same time, it calls attention to how Bangladesh's protracted displacement crisis remains under acknowledged and therefore under addressed in national policy and programming. The findings and recommendations in this report are intended to inform the UNFCCC's Loss and Damage mechanism – the Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD), the Santiago Network for Loss and Damage (SNLD) and the Warsaw International Mechanism (WIM) ExCom, including its Taskforce on Displacement. Each must urgently demonstrate its commitment to addressing the growing displacement crisis and supporting durable solution programming. The report's findings and recommendations are also relevant to intergovernmental, governmental and civil society organisations working in and outside Bangladesh. Furthermore, the report suggests how conventional durable solutions approaches to displacement must evolve to remain relevant in a world of escalating losses and damages resulting from climate change.